Today, large parts of Europe are populated by speakers of Indo-European languages. People have long wondered where they came from, where their original home was. Archeology has long been trusted to provide a solution to the problem. This has now been abandoned. Today there is a great deal of trust in the results of genetic research, which can certainly contribute to important findings. However, one should not forget an important aspect: when one looks for the speakers of Indo-European languages, one is not looking for specific material finds (devices, weapons, etc.) or for the carriers of certain genetic peculiarities, but for the speakers of languages. Their homeland and distribution can only be determined using linguistic methods. The languages alone are crucial. And at this point a scientific discipline that is based on languages comes into view: it is place name research. Place and river names are firmly anchored in the original region. They often pass on their names to changing populations and are therefore undoubtedly the most important witnesses to the history of peoples and languages. And another scientific discipline must be included: agricultural science, because early settlements were based on good and productive soils that enabled continuous settlement. With the help of geographical names and the distribution of Europe's good soils, the study determines the original settlements of the Slavs on the northern slope of the Carpathians, the Germanic tribes north of the Harz and those of the Celts on the western edge of the Carpathians. River names that can be assigned to Old European, i.e. Indo-European, hydronymy also show that old ones come from almost all settlement areas. There is evidence of connections to the Baltics and the Baltic languages. The Baltics are therefore the center of Indo-European names and there is no reason not to consider them as the starting area and home of Indo-European expansions. A homeland outside of Old European hydronymy, be it in southern Russia or in Asia Minor or in the Caucasus, as is often assumed today, especially on the basis of genetic studies, is excluded.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 12, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13 |
Page(s) | 121-151 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Indo-Europeans, River Names, Slavs, Germanic Peoples, Celts, Balts, Old European Hydronymy, Original Homeland
[1] | Alemannien und der Norden. Berlin - New York 2004. |
[2] | Andersson, Th. (1977): “Alteuropäische Hydronymie aus nordischer Sichtˮ. In: Namenkundliche Informationen 30, 18-35. |
[3] | Andersson, Th. (1988): “Zur Geschichte der Theorie einer alteuropäischen Hydronymieˮ. In: Probleme der Namenbildung, 59-90. |
[4] | Ascher, D. (2020): Die Ortsnamen des Landkreises Fulda, Freiburg. |
[5] | Babik, Z. (2001): Najstarsza warstwa nazewnicza na ziemiach polskich, Kraków. |
[6] | M. Bathe [undated], Die Ortsnamen auf -leben, manuscript [Berlin]. |
[7] | Bichlmeier, H. (2010): “Bairisch-österreichische Orts- und Gewässernamen aus indogermanistischer Sichtˮ. In: Beiträge zur oberdeutschen Namenforschung 46, 3- 63. |
[8] | Billy, P.-H. (1993): Thesaurus linguae Gallicae. Hildesheim. |
[9] | Bischoff, K. (1975): Germ. haugaz 'Hügel, Grabhügel' im Deutschen. Eine Flurnamenstudie. Mainz. |
[10] | Brather, S. (2004): Ethnische Interpretationen in der frühgeschichtlichen Archäologe, Berlin. |
[11] | Busse, P. (2007): “Hydronymie und Urheimat: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Lokalisierung der Urheimat der Kelten?ˮ. In: Kelten-Einfälle an der Donau. Akten des 4. Symposiums Deutschsprachiger Keltologinnen und Keltologen vom 17.-21. Juli 2005 in Linz. Wien, 89-98. |
[12] | Casemir, K. (1997): Die Ortsnamen auf –büttel, Leipzig. |
[13] | Casemir, K. (2003): Die Ortsnamen des Landkreises Wolfenbüttel und der Stadt Salzgitter (= NOB, Band 3), Bielefeld. |
[14] | Casemir, K.; Udolph, J. (2006): “ Die Bedeutung des Baltischen für die niedersächsische Ortsnamenforschungˮ; In: Baltų onomastikos tyrimai (Gedenkschrift A. Vanagas), Vilnius, 114-136. |
[15] | Collis, J. (2003): Celts - Origins, Myths and Inventions, London. |
[16] | Delamarre, X. (2003): Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. 2. Auflage. Paris. |
[17] | Dini, P. U. (2005): “Slawisch-baltische Sprachbeziehungenˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 29, 73-78. |
[18] | Falileyev, A. (2006/7): Dictionary of Continental Celtic Place-Names. A Celtic Companion to the Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World, Aberystwyth 2010. |
[19] | Förstemann, E. (1863): Die deutschen Ortsnamen. Nordhausen. |
[20] | Gołąb, Z. (1992): The Origins of the Slavs. A Linguist’s View. Columbus (Ohio). |
[21] | Greule, A. (1973): Vor- und frühgermanische Flußnamen am Ober¬rhein. Heidelberg. |
[22] | Greule, A. (2014): Deutsches Gewässernamenbuch, Berlin/Boston. |
[23] | Grimm, J. (1826): Deutsche Grammatik. Zweiter Teil. Göttingen. |
[24] | Grimm, J. (1845): Geschichte der deutschen Sprache, Leipzig. |
[25] | Grimm, J. (1871): Kleinere Schriften, Bd. 5, Berlin. |
[26] | Haase, D. et al. (2007): “Loess in Europe - its spatial distribution based on a European Loess Map, scale 1:2,500,000ˮ. In: Quaternary Science Reviews 26 (9-10): 1301-1312. |
[27] | Immel, U.-D. et al. (2006): “Y-chromosomal STR haplotype analysis reveals surname-associated strata in the East-German populationˮ. In: European Journal of Human Genetics (14), 577–582. |
[28] | James, S. (1999): The Atlantic Celts, London. |
[29] | Kettner, B.-U. (1972): Flußnamen im Stromgebiet der oberen und mittleren Leine, Rinteln. |
[30] | Kolb, E. (1957): Alemannisch-nordgermanisches Wortgut. Frauenfeld. |
[31] | Krahe, H. (1949-1950): “Alteuropäische Flußnamenˮ. In: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, 24-51. |
[32] | Krahe, H. (1964): Unsere ältesten Flußnamen, Wiesbaden. |
[33] | Krahe, H.; Meid, W. (1967): Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Bd. 3: Wortbildungslehre. Berlin. |
[34] | Kuhn, H. (1978): Das letzte Indogermanisch, Mainz-Wiesbaden. |
[35] | Kuiper, F. B. J. (1971): “Besprechung zu: W. P. Schmid, Alteuropäisch und Indogermanischˮ. In: Indo-Iranian Journal 13, 1971: 126-128. |
[36] | Kunstmann, H. (1996): Die Slaven. Ihr Name, ihre Wanderung nach Europa und die Anfänge der russischen Geschichte in historisch-onomastischer Sicht. Stuttgart. |
[37] | Leibniz, G. W. (1882): Die philosophischen Schriften, hrsg. v. C. I. Gerhard, Bd.5, Berlin. |
[38] | Matasović, R. (2009): Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic, Leiden. |
[39] | Meyer, B. (1978): “Bodenkunde und Siedlungsforschungˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Bd. 3, Berlin - New York, S. 117-120. |
[40] | Möller, R. (1992): Dentalsuffixe in niedersächsischen Siedlungs- und Flurnamen in Zeugnissen vor dem Jahre 1200. Heidelberg. |
[41] | Möller, R. (2000): Niedersächsische Siedlungsnamen und Flurnamen mit k-Suffix und s-Suffix in Zeugnissen vor dem Jahre 1200. Hei¬delberg. |
[42] | Müller, H. H.; Kutas, M. (1997): “Die Verarbeitung von Eigennamen und Gattungsbezeichnungen. Eine elektrophysiologische Studieˮ. In: Rickheit, Gert (Hrsg)., Studien zur Klinischen Linguistik: Modelle, Methoden, Interventionen, Opladen, 147-169. |
[43] | NOB (1998f.): Niedersächsisches Ortsnamenbuch. Bielefeld. |
[44] | Rębała, K. (2007): “Y-STR variation among Slavs: evidence for the Slavic homeland in the middle Dnieper basinˮ. In: Journal of Human Genetics 52 (5): 406-414. |
[45] | Roewer, L. et al. (2005): “Signature of recent historical events in the European Y-chromosomal STR haplotype distributionˮ. In: Human Genetics 116 (4): 279-291. |
[46] | Rozwadowski J. (1948): Studia nad nazwami wód słowiańskich, Kraków. |
[47] | Rymut, K.; Majtán, M. (1998): Gewässernamen im Flußgebiet des Dunajec, Stuttgart. |
[48] | Scheffer, F. (1978): “Boden in Mitteleuropaˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertums¬kunde, Bd. 3, Berlin - New York, S. 108-117. |
[49] | Scherer, A. (1961): “Der Ursprung der alteuropäischen Hydronymieˮ. In: Atti e Memorie VII Congresso Intern. di Science Onomastiche, Bd. 2, Firenze, 405-417. |
[50] | Schlüter, O. (1953): Die Siedlungsräume Mitteleuropas in frühgeschichtlicher Zeit, Hamburg. |
[51] | Schlüter, O. (1958): Das mittlere und nordöstliche Mitteleuropa, Remagen. |
[52] | Schmid, W. P. (1976): “Baltische Sprachen und Völkerˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Bd. 2, Berlin-New York. |
[53] | Schmid, W. P. (1988): “Zu einigen keltisch-baltischen Namenentsprechungenˮ. In: Studia Indogermanica et Slavica. Festgabe für Werner Thomas, München, 49-56. |
[54] | Schmid, W. P. (1994): Linguisticae Scientiae Collectanea. Ausgewählte Schriften, Berlin - New York. |
[55] | Schmid, W. P. (2004): “Versuch über den Namen der Loireˮ. In: Sprache, Sprechen, Sprichwörter. Festschrift für D. Stellmacher zum 65. Geburtstag, Stuttgart, 291-295. |
[56] | Schmid, W. (2007): “Zur Begrifflichkeit in der Konzeption der Alteuropäischen Hydronymieˮ. In: Namenkundliche Informationen 91/92: 11-14. |
[57] | Schramm, G. (2001): “Ein erstarrtes Konzept der Flußnamenphilologie: Alteuropaˮ. In: Namn och Bygd 89, 5-20. |
[58] | Sims-Williams, P.(2006): Ancient Celtic Place-Names in Europe and Asia Minor. Oxford. |
[59] | Słownik Prasłowiański (1974): F. Sławski (Red.), Słownik Prasłowiański, Bd. 1, Warszawa 1974. |
[60] | Toporov, V. N.; Trubačev, O. N. (1962). Lingvističeskij analiz gidronimov Podneprov'ja, Moskva. |
[61] | Tovar, A. (1977): Krahes alteuropäische Hydronymie und die west¬indogermanischen Spra¬chen, Heidelberg. |
[62] | Trubačev, O. N. (1968): Nazvanija rek pravoberežnoj Ukrainy, Moskva. |
[63] | Trubačev, O. N. (1982-1984): Jazykoznanie i ėtnogenez slavjan (Drevnie slavjane po dannym ėtimologii i onomastiki). In: Voprosy jazykoznanija 1982, 4: 10-26, 5: 3-17; 1984, 3: 18-29. |
[64] | Udolph, J.. (1978): “Zur frühen Gliederung des Indogermanischenˮ. In: Indogermanische Forschungen 86: 30-70. |
[65] | Udolph, J.. (1979): Studien zu slavischen Gewässernamen und Gewässerbezeichungen, Heidelberg. |
[66] | Udolph, J. (1981): ˮEx oriente lux - Zu einigen germanischen Flußnamenˮ. In: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge 16, 84-106. |
[67] | Udolph, J. (1985): “Ex oriente lux - auch in deutschen Flurnamenˮ. In: Gießener Flurnamenkolloquium, Hei¬delberg 1985, 272-298. |
[68] | Udolph, J.. (1988): “Kamen die Slaven aus Pannonien?ˮ. In: Studia nad etnogenezą Słowian (Festschrift f. W. Hensel), Wrocław usw., 168-173. |
[69] | Udolph, J. (1990): Die Stellung der Gewässernamen Polens innerhalb der alteuropäischen Hydronymie, Heidelberg. |
[70] | Udolph, J. (1994): Namenkundliche Studien zum Germanenproblem, Berlin - New York. |
[71] | Udolph, J. (1997): “Alteuropäische Hydronymie und urslavische Gewässernamenˮ. In: Onomastica 42: 21-70. |
[72] | Udolph, J. (1998): “Typen urslavischer Gewässernamenˮ. In: Prasłowiańszczyna i jej rozpad, Warszawa: 275-294. |
[73] | Udolph, J. (1999a): Die Schichtung der Gewässernamen in Pannonien. In: Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, Neue Folge 15, 90-106. |
[74] | Udolph, J. (1999b): “Baltisches in Niedersachsen?ˮ. In: Florilegium Linguisticum. Festschrift f. W. P. Schmid zum 70. Geb., Frankfurt/Main [usw.]: 493-508. |
[75] | Udolph, J. (2000a): “Der Weserraum im Spiegel der Ortsnamenforschungˮ. In: Die Weser – EinFluß in Europa. Bd. 1: Leuchtendes Mittelalter, hrsg. v. N. Humburg u. J. Schween. Holzminden, 24-37. |
[76] | Udolph, J. (2000b): “Slavjano-germanskie svjazi v severno-nemeckich toponimachˮ. In: Ėtimologija 1997-1999. Moskva, 185-191. |
[77] | Udolph, J.. (2000c): “Nordisches in niedersächsischen Ortsnamenˮ. In: Raum, Zeit, Medium – Sprache und ihre Determinanten. Festschrift f. H. Ramge, 59-79. |
[78] | Udolph, J. (2004a): “Suffixbildungen in alten Ortsnamen Nord- und Mitteldeutschlandsˮ. In: Suffixbildungen in alten Ortsnamen, Uppsala 2004, 137-175. |
[79] | Udolph, J. (2004b): “Nordisches in deutschen Ortsnamenˮ. In: Namenwelten. Orts- und Personennamen in historischer Sicht. Berlin - New York, 359-371. |
[80] | Udolph, J. (2004c): Alemannien und der Norden aus der Sicht der Ortsnamenforschung. In: Alemannien und der Norden (1) (S. 29-56). |
[81] | Udolph, J. (2005a): “Slavisch-Baltisch-Germanische Übereinstimmungen in Toponymie und Hydronymieˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Bd. 29, Berlin - New York, 64-67. |
[82] | Udolph, J. (2005b): “Germanisch-Slawische Sprachbeziehungenˮ. In: Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Bd. 29, Berlin - New York, 69-73. |
[83] | Udolph, J. (2008): “Ortsnamen und Wanderungen der Völkerˮ. In: Jahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Berlin-New York, 392-397. |
[84] | Udolph, Jürgen (2009): “Lichtensteinhöhle, Siedlungskontinuität und das Zeugnis der Familien-, Orts- und Gewässernamenˮ. In: Historia archaeologica. Festschrift f. Heiko Steuer, Berlin - New York, 85-105. |
[85] | Udolph, J. (2010a): “Morphologie germanischer Toponymeˮ. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Onomastic Sciences, Bd. 5, Uppsala, 254-267. |
[86] | Udolph, J. (2011b): “Skandinavische Wörter in deutschen Ortsnamenˮ. In: Probleme der Rekonstruktion untergegangener Wörter aus alten Eigennamen. Eigennamen. Uppsala, 141-158. |
[87] | Udolph, J. (2011c): “ʽBaltisches՚ und ʽSlavisches՚ in norddeutschen Ortsnamenˮ. In: Interferenz-Onomastik. Namen in Grenz- und Begegnungsräumen in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Saarbrücken, 313-331. |
[88] | Udolph, J. (2011d): “Onomastik und Genetikˮ. In: Onoma 45, 277-299. |
[89] | Udolph, J. (2013): “Vaskonisches und Semitisches in Europa aus namenkundlicher Sichtˮ. In: Europa Vasconica - Europa Semitica? Kritische Beiträge zur Frage nach dem baskischen und semitischen Substrat in Europa. Hamburg, 211-324. |
[90] | Udolph (2016a): “Rezension zu: W. Wenzel, Namen und Geschichte. Orts- und Personennamen im deutsch-slavischen Sprachkontaktraum als historische Zeugnisse, Hamburg 2014ˮ. In: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge 51, 242-252. |
[91] | Udolph, J. (2016b): “Expansion slavischer Stämme aus namenkundlicher und bodenkundlicher Sichtˮ. In: Onomastica 60, 215-231. |
[92] | Udolph, J. (2016c): “Heimat und Ausbreitung slavischer Stämme aus namenkundlicher Sichtˮ. In: Die frühen Slawen - von der Expansion zu gentes und nationes. Teilband 1: Beiträge zum Schwerpunktthema, Langenweissbach, 27-51. |
[93] | Udolph, J. (2023): “Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collectionˮ. In: International Journal of Language and Linguistics 11(4): 136-147. |
[94] | Untermann, J. (2009): “Zur Problematik der alteuropäischen Hydronymie: Hispanien und Italienˮ. In: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge 44: 1-34. |
[95] | Vasmer, M. (1971): Schriften zur slavischen Altertumskunde und Namenkunde, hrsg. v. H. Bräuer, Bd. 1, Berlin-Wiesbaden. |
[96] | Vennemann, Th. (2003): Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica, Berlin - New York. |
APA Style
Udolph, J. (2024). Home and Spread of Indo-European Tribes in the Light of Name Research. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12(3), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13
ACS Style
Udolph, J. Home and Spread of Indo-European Tribes in the Light of Name Research. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2024, 12(3), 121-151. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13
AMA Style
Udolph J. Home and Spread of Indo-European Tribes in the Light of Name Research. Int J Lang Linguist. 2024;12(3):121-151. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13, author = {Jürgen Udolph}, title = {Home and Spread of Indo-European Tribes in the Light of Name Research }, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, pages = {121-151}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20241203.13}, abstract = {Today, large parts of Europe are populated by speakers of Indo-European languages. People have long wondered where they came from, where their original home was. Archeology has long been trusted to provide a solution to the problem. This has now been abandoned. Today there is a great deal of trust in the results of genetic research, which can certainly contribute to important findings. However, one should not forget an important aspect: when one looks for the speakers of Indo-European languages, one is not looking for specific material finds (devices, weapons, etc.) or for the carriers of certain genetic peculiarities, but for the speakers of languages. Their homeland and distribution can only be determined using linguistic methods. The languages alone are crucial. And at this point a scientific discipline that is based on languages comes into view: it is place name research. Place and river names are firmly anchored in the original region. They often pass on their names to changing populations and are therefore undoubtedly the most important witnesses to the history of peoples and languages. And another scientific discipline must be included: agricultural science, because early settlements were based on good and productive soils that enabled continuous settlement. With the help of geographical names and the distribution of Europe's good soils, the study determines the original settlements of the Slavs on the northern slope of the Carpathians, the Germanic tribes north of the Harz and those of the Celts on the western edge of the Carpathians. River names that can be assigned to Old European, i.e. Indo-European, hydronymy also show that old ones come from almost all settlement areas. There is evidence of connections to the Baltics and the Baltic languages. The Baltics are therefore the center of Indo-European names and there is no reason not to consider them as the starting area and home of Indo-European expansions. A homeland outside of Old European hydronymy, be it in southern Russia or in Asia Minor or in the Caucasus, as is often assumed today, especially on the basis of genetic studies, is excluded. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Home and Spread of Indo-European Tribes in the Light of Name Research AU - Jürgen Udolph Y1 - 2024/05/30 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 121 EP - 151 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.13 AB - Today, large parts of Europe are populated by speakers of Indo-European languages. People have long wondered where they came from, where their original home was. Archeology has long been trusted to provide a solution to the problem. This has now been abandoned. Today there is a great deal of trust in the results of genetic research, which can certainly contribute to important findings. However, one should not forget an important aspect: when one looks for the speakers of Indo-European languages, one is not looking for specific material finds (devices, weapons, etc.) or for the carriers of certain genetic peculiarities, but for the speakers of languages. Their homeland and distribution can only be determined using linguistic methods. The languages alone are crucial. And at this point a scientific discipline that is based on languages comes into view: it is place name research. Place and river names are firmly anchored in the original region. They often pass on their names to changing populations and are therefore undoubtedly the most important witnesses to the history of peoples and languages. And another scientific discipline must be included: agricultural science, because early settlements were based on good and productive soils that enabled continuous settlement. With the help of geographical names and the distribution of Europe's good soils, the study determines the original settlements of the Slavs on the northern slope of the Carpathians, the Germanic tribes north of the Harz and those of the Celts on the western edge of the Carpathians. River names that can be assigned to Old European, i.e. Indo-European, hydronymy also show that old ones come from almost all settlement areas. There is evidence of connections to the Baltics and the Baltic languages. The Baltics are therefore the center of Indo-European names and there is no reason not to consider them as the starting area and home of Indo-European expansions. A homeland outside of Old European hydronymy, be it in southern Russia or in Asia Minor or in the Caucasus, as is often assumed today, especially on the basis of genetic studies, is excluded. VL - 12 IS - 3 ER -