In this paper, a second method for the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for line of site wireless communication link with nonzero path inclination and with known height of one of the antennas is presented. In the first method,(not presented here), none of the antenna height is known. In this second paper, the height of one of the antenna is known, particularly, the antenna that is above the maximum obstruction height. This places further constraint in the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for the lower antenna. In this paper, both the mathematical models and the algorithm are presented along with sample numerical example using path profile data for a 3 GHz microwave communication link with path length of 38.8876 km. The know antenna height is 20 m above the maximum height of the tip of the obstruction which is found to be 146.62 m at a distance of 14306.98 m from the transmitter. From the result, the receiver antenna height is 166.6 m and transmitter antenna height is 135.35 m whereas, the transmitter antenna mast height is 45.51 m while the receiver antenna mast height is 117.1 m the path inclination is 0.804. The ideas presented in this paper are particularly useful when a line of sight link is to be extended from an existing transmitting point.
Published in | American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16 |
Page(s) | 44-48 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Microwave Communication Link, Path Inclination, Elevation Profile, Antenna Mast Height, Line of Sight Communication
[1] | Thakur, A., Kamboj, S., & Scholar, P. G. (2016). Transmission and Optimization of a 3G Microwave Network at 18 GHz. International Journal of Engineering Science, 5622. |
[2] | Kildal, P. S. (2015). Foundations of Antenna Engineering: A Unified Approach for Line-of-sight and Multipath. Artech House. |
[3] | Boccardi, F., Heath, R. W., Lozano, A., Marzetta, T. L., & Popovski, P. (2014). Five disruptive technology directions for 5G. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52 (2), 74-80. |
[4] | Al Mahmud, M. R. (2009). Analysis and planning microwave link to established efficient wireless communications (Doctoral dissertation, Blekinge Institute of Technology). |
[5] | Sim, C. Y. D. (2002). The propagation of VHF and UHF radio waves over sea paths (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester). |
[6] | Shaver, R. J., Saville, M. A., & Park, J. (2016, May). Modeling terrain profiles from digital terrain elevation data and national land cover data. InSPIE Defense+Security (pp. 98430L-98430L). International Society for Optics and Photonics. |
[7] | Kvicera, M., Pechac, P., Valtr, P., Korinek, T., Kvicera, V., Grabner, M., & Martellucci, A. (2015). Influence of Input Terrain Profile Resolution on Diffraction Modeling. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 14, 1318-1321. |
[8] | Dalbakk, L. E. (2014). Antenna System for Tracking of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. |
[9] | Kang, Y. H. (2015). Analysis on the Path Length of M/W Access Link for Mobile Backhaul Design. The Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology, 19 (6), 607-613. |
[10] | Jicha, O., Pechac, P., Kvicera, V., & Grabner, M. (2013). Estimation of the radio refractivity gradient from diffraction loss measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51 (1), 12-18. |
[11] | Adediji, A. T., Mandeep, J. S., & Ismail, M. (2014). Meteorological Characterization of Effective Earth Radius Factor (k-Factor) for Wireless Radio Link Over Akure, Nigeria. Mapan, 29 (2), 131-141. |
[12] | Jouad, A., Bor, J., Lafond, O., & Himdi, M. (2016, April). Millimeter-wave fresnel zone plate lens based on foam gradient index technological process. In 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)(pp. 1-4). IEEE. |
[13] | Ahamed, M. M., & Faruque, S. (2015, May). Path loss slope based cell selection and handover in heterogeneous networks. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT) (pp. 499-504). IEEE. |
[14] | Mazar, H. (1991, March). LOS radio links, clearance above tall buildings. InElectrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, 1991. Proceedings., 17th Convention of (pp. 145-148). IEEE |
[15] | Sen, S. (2006). Topology planning for long distance wireless mesh networks (Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur). |
APA Style
Fidelis Osanebi Chucks Nwaduwa, Wali Samuel, Elsie Chidinma Anderson. (2017). Determination of the Minimum Antenna Mast Height with Nonzero Path Inclination: Method II. American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 6(2), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16
ACS Style
Fidelis Osanebi Chucks Nwaduwa; Wali Samuel; Elsie Chidinma Anderson. Determination of the Minimum Antenna Mast Height with Nonzero Path Inclination: Method II. Am. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 2017, 6(2), 44-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16
AMA Style
Fidelis Osanebi Chucks Nwaduwa, Wali Samuel, Elsie Chidinma Anderson. Determination of the Minimum Antenna Mast Height with Nonzero Path Inclination: Method II. Am J Softw Eng Appl. 2017;6(2):44-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16
@article{10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16, author = {Fidelis Osanebi Chucks Nwaduwa and Wali Samuel and Elsie Chidinma Anderson}, title = {Determination of the Minimum Antenna Mast Height with Nonzero Path Inclination: Method II}, journal = {American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {44-48}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajsea.20170602.16}, abstract = {In this paper, a second method for the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for line of site wireless communication link with nonzero path inclination and with known height of one of the antennas is presented. In the first method,(not presented here), none of the antenna height is known. In this second paper, the height of one of the antenna is known, particularly, the antenna that is above the maximum obstruction height. This places further constraint in the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for the lower antenna. In this paper, both the mathematical models and the algorithm are presented along with sample numerical example using path profile data for a 3 GHz microwave communication link with path length of 38.8876 km. The know antenna height is 20 m above the maximum height of the tip of the obstruction which is found to be 146.62 m at a distance of 14306.98 m from the transmitter. From the result, the receiver antenna height is 166.6 m and transmitter antenna height is 135.35 m whereas, the transmitter antenna mast height is 45.51 m while the receiver antenna mast height is 117.1 m the path inclination is 0.804. The ideas presented in this paper are particularly useful when a line of sight link is to be extended from an existing transmitting point.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determination of the Minimum Antenna Mast Height with Nonzero Path Inclination: Method II AU - Fidelis Osanebi Chucks Nwaduwa AU - Wali Samuel AU - Elsie Chidinma Anderson Y1 - 2017/06/12 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16 T2 - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications JF - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications JO - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications SP - 44 EP - 48 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-249X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20170602.16 AB - In this paper, a second method for the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for line of site wireless communication link with nonzero path inclination and with known height of one of the antennas is presented. In the first method,(not presented here), none of the antenna height is known. In this second paper, the height of one of the antenna is known, particularly, the antenna that is above the maximum obstruction height. This places further constraint in the determination of the minimum antenna mast height for the lower antenna. In this paper, both the mathematical models and the algorithm are presented along with sample numerical example using path profile data for a 3 GHz microwave communication link with path length of 38.8876 km. The know antenna height is 20 m above the maximum height of the tip of the obstruction which is found to be 146.62 m at a distance of 14306.98 m from the transmitter. From the result, the receiver antenna height is 166.6 m and transmitter antenna height is 135.35 m whereas, the transmitter antenna mast height is 45.51 m while the receiver antenna mast height is 117.1 m the path inclination is 0.804. The ideas presented in this paper are particularly useful when a line of sight link is to be extended from an existing transmitting point. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -