E-learning has become one of the major components in education processes, and it is one of the most important elements in which universities can attain a competitive advantage. Virtual learning environment (VLE), which is considered as a subpart of the LMS, allows educators and educational systems to go beyond place and ti.me in communication with every student. For this reason universities focus on having LMS, for it helps users access educational sources that is not only reliable, but also has the possibility to be integrated with other systems available at the university. The paper highlights and explores the different theories and methodologies related to implementing and switching virtual learning environment successfully. Many previous studies, framework, theories and models have been reviewed; those models and frameworks identify how successful the implementation of virtual learning environments is in higher educational institutes.
Published in | American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11 |
Page(s) | 33-45 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
E-Learing, Virtual Learning, Educational Sources Online
[1] | Alhogail, A.A. and Mirza, A.A. (2011). IMPLEMENTING A VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (VLE) IN A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION: A CHANGE MANAGEMENT APPROACH. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology.approach to planning, design, instruction, evaluation, and accreditation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.approach to planning, design, instruction, evaluation, and accreditation. New York, NY: Teachers |
[2] | Ardito, C., Costabile, M.F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., and Rossano, V. 2005. An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2006, 4: 270–283 Published online: 8 December 2005. |
[3] | Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. (2007). Management: Leading and collaborating in a competitive world (7th ed., pp. 16 -18). New York, NY:McGraw- Hill. |
[4] | Beastall, L. and Walker, R., “Effecting institutional change through e-learning: An implementation model for VLE deployment at the University of York”, Journal of Organisational Transformational and Social Change, 3(3), (2007), 285-299. |
[5] | Bremer, D, Bryant, R. (2005) “A Comparison of two learning management Systems: Moodle vs Blackboard” , Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications. pg135-1390CE |
[6] | Buchan, J. (2010). Putting ourselves in the big picture: A sustainable approach to project management for e-learning. The Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 55-76. |
[7] | Bremer, D, Bryant, R. (2005) “A Comparison of two learning management Systems: Moodle vs Blackboard” , Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications. pg135-1390CE |
[8] | Cook, D. A. 2009. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Informa, 2009, 31(2):158-162 |
[9] | Derntl, M. & Motschnig-pitrik, R. (2004). Patterns for Blended, Person-Centered Learning: Strategy, Concepts, Experiences, and Evaluation. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. - (-), 916-923. |
[10] | Dublin, L., (2004), “The nine myths of elearning implementation: ensuring the real return on your e-learning investment”,Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(7),(2004), 291-294. |
[11] | Ghavifekr, S. & Hussin, S. (2011). Managing Systemic Change in a Technology-based Education System: A Malaysian Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 28 (-), 455-464. |
[12] | Hameed, S., Fathulla, K., and Thomas, A. 2009. Extent of e-learning effectiveness and efficiency in an integrated blended learning environment. Newport CELT Journal, 2:52-62. |
[13] | Hameed, S., Fathulla, K., and Thomas, A. 2009. Extent of e-learning effectiveness and efficiency in an integrated blended learning environment. Newport CELT Journal, 2:52-62. |
[14] | IEEE. Draft Standard for Learning Technology – Learning Technology Systems Architecture (LTSA) (IEEE P1484.1/D9), 2001. |
[15] | Johnson, S., Aragon, S., Shaik, N. and Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learner Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. Vol 11(1). pp 29 – 49. |
[16] | Johnson, S., Aragon, S., Shaik, N. and Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learner Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. Vol 11(1). pp 29 – 49. |
[17] | Khan, B. H. (2005). ELearning Quick Checklist, Information Science Publishing , Idea Group Inc, Hershey PA,USA . |
[18] | Khan, B. H. (2006). Flexible Learning in an Information Society , Information Science Publishing , Idea Group Inc,Hershey PA, USA. |
[19] | Khan, B. H. 2004. People, process and product continuum in e-learning: The e-learning P3 model. Educational Technology, 44(5): 33-40. |
[20] | Kotter, J. P. 1998. “Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.” In Harvard Business Review on Change, 1–20.Boston: Harvard Business School Press. |
[21] | Marshall, S. J. (2004). Leading and managing the development of e-learning environments: An issue of comfort or discomfort? In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings ASCILITE Perth 2004. |
[22] | Menchaca, M., Bischoff, M., & Abrams, B. (2003). A Model for Systemic Change Management in Education. Paper Presented in International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technology and Applications (EISTA 03), 26. |
[23] | Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material |
[24] | Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford University Press. |
[25] | VanRaaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education 50, 838-852. |
[26] | Richards, L, Connolly, M., & O’Shea, J. (2004). Managing the concept of strategic change within a higher education institution: The role of strategic and scenario planning techniques. Journal of Strategic Change, 13, pp. 345-359. |
[27] | Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M. K., & Baker, J. D. (2008). Distance learning in higher education. A programmatic |
[28] | Russell, C, (2009) “A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: individual strategies in context”,Research in Learning Technology, 7 (1), 3-19. |
[29] | Saeedikiya, M., Mooghali, A., and Setoodeh B. 2010. Stages of the Implementation of E-Learning in Traditional Universities, Edulearn10 Proceedings, Pp. 6620-6624. |
[30] | Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., and Francis, R., (2006), “Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools”, Research in Learning Technology,14(2), 135–151. |
[31] | Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., and Francis, R., (2006), “Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools”, Research in Learning Technology,14(2), 135–151. |
[32] | Singh, H. (2003) Building Effective Blended Learning Programs Harvey .Issue of Educational Technology, 43, (6), 51-54. |
[33] | Uys, P. M. & Tulloch, M. K. (2007). Appropriate change leadership for the introduction of flexible learning within university governance and strategic leadership frameworks: A comparative analysis of case studies in developed and developing countries. Integrating for Excellence 3rd International Conference. 27-28 June, Sheffield Hallam university. |
[34] | Uys, P.M. (2010). Implementing an open source learning management system: A critical analysis of change strategies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26 (7), 980-995. |
[35] | VanRaaij E.M. and Schepers J.J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education,vol. 50, pp. 838-852. |
[36] | Ward, M., West, S., Peat, M. and Atkinson,S., “Making it Real: Project Managing Strategic e-Learning development Processes in a Large, Campus-Based University”, Journal Of Distance Education, 24(1),(2010), 21-42. |
[37] | www.blackbaord.com, (2012) Viewed online on 23th Jan 2012. |
[38] | www.ju.edu.jo (2012), Viewed online on 12th Jan 2012. |
[39] | www.moodle.org (2012), Viewed online on 22th Jan 2012. |
[40] | Zwass, A. (1998). Foundations of information systems. USA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. 496-514. |
APA Style
Ayman Ahmed AlQudah. (2014). Models and Frameworks for a Successful Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Implementation. American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 3(4), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11
ACS Style
Ayman Ahmed AlQudah. Models and Frameworks for a Successful Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Implementation. Am. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 2014, 3(4), 33-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11
AMA Style
Ayman Ahmed AlQudah. Models and Frameworks for a Successful Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Implementation. Am J Softw Eng Appl. 2014;3(4):33-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11, author = {Ayman Ahmed AlQudah}, title = {Models and Frameworks for a Successful Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Implementation}, journal = {American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {33-45}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajsea.20140304.11}, abstract = {E-learning has become one of the major components in education processes, and it is one of the most important elements in which universities can attain a competitive advantage. Virtual learning environment (VLE), which is considered as a subpart of the LMS, allows educators and educational systems to go beyond place and ti.me in communication with every student. For this reason universities focus on having LMS, for it helps users access educational sources that is not only reliable, but also has the possibility to be integrated with other systems available at the university. The paper highlights and explores the different theories and methodologies related to implementing and switching virtual learning environment successfully. Many previous studies, framework, theories and models have been reviewed; those models and frameworks identify how successful the implementation of virtual learning environments is in higher educational institutes.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Models and Frameworks for a Successful Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Implementation AU - Ayman Ahmed AlQudah Y1 - 2014/08/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11 T2 - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications JF - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications JO - American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications SP - 33 EP - 45 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-249X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsea.20140304.11 AB - E-learning has become one of the major components in education processes, and it is one of the most important elements in which universities can attain a competitive advantage. Virtual learning environment (VLE), which is considered as a subpart of the LMS, allows educators and educational systems to go beyond place and ti.me in communication with every student. For this reason universities focus on having LMS, for it helps users access educational sources that is not only reliable, but also has the possibility to be integrated with other systems available at the university. The paper highlights and explores the different theories and methodologies related to implementing and switching virtual learning environment successfully. Many previous studies, framework, theories and models have been reviewed; those models and frameworks identify how successful the implementation of virtual learning environments is in higher educational institutes. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -